Nvec: различия между версиями
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
Нет описания правки |
Stuw (обсуждение | вклад) Нет описания правки |
||
Строка 2: | Строка 2: | ||
Small nvec discussion log: | Small nvec discussion log: | ||
<stuw> marvin24, srwarren I have a question about nvec implementation. http://gitorious.org/~marvin24/ac100/marvin24s-kernel/blobs/rel-15r7-ac100/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c#line324 <- in case of error we keep msg allocated. After few errors we have no available slots in msg_pool. I suppose msg is not needed any more if error has occurred. Did I miss something in my reasoning? | <pre><stuw> marvin24, srwarren I have a question about nvec implementation. http://gitorious.org/~marvin24/ac100/marvin24s-kernel/blobs/rel-15r7-ac100/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c#line324 <- in case of error we keep msg allocated. After few errors we have no available slots in msg_pool. I suppose msg is not needed any more if error has occurred. Did I miss something in my reasoning? | ||
<marvin24> stuw: I already send a fix for rpiloose for this | <marvin24> stuw: I already send a fix for rpiloose for this | ||
<marvin24> for->from | <marvin24> for->from | ||
Строка 41: | Строка 41: | ||
<rpiloose> dump of the code by muromec @ 17 march 2011: http://crap.muromec.org.ua/ac100/ecdump.bin | <rpiloose> dump of the code by muromec @ 17 march 2011: http://crap.muromec.org.ua/ac100/ecdump.bin | ||
<rpiloose> of shit, I missed that: http://share.grandou.net/ac100/ec/ | <rpiloose> of shit, I missed that: http://share.grandou.net/ac100/ec/ | ||
</pre> | |||
===Errors=== | ===Errors=== |
Версия от 06:37, 14 ноября 2014
Discussions
Small nvec discussion log:
<stuw> marvin24, srwarren I have a question about nvec implementation. http://gitorious.org/~marvin24/ac100/marvin24s-kernel/blobs/rel-15r7-ac100/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c#line324 <- in case of error we keep msg allocated. After few errors we have no available slots in msg_pool. I suppose msg is not needed any more if error has occurred. Did I miss something in my reasoning? <marvin24> stuw: I already send a fix for rpiloose for this <marvin24> for->from <marvin24> ah,maybe not - this is a different one <marvin24> stuw: isn't the message freed in line 337? <marvin24> ah, no, err == 0 is the error condition <marvin24> weird <stuw> marvin24, code looks like we want to wait/get responce at any price <marvin24> stuw: in the error case the message pointer is just reset <marvin24> no new buffer will get reserved <marvin24> it just picks the old one from the list <stuw> marvin24> stuw: in the error case the message pointer is just reset <- are you talking about msg->pos = 0 ? <stuw> nvec_msg_alloc returns first unused (used flag is 0) msg from pool. nvec_request_master never marks msg as unused (never call nvec_msg_free for this msg) in case of error. <stuw> I didn't analyze nvec driver enough to understand what msg->pos = 0 means :( <marvin24> stuw: request_master checks if there is a message queued to be send to the ec <marvin24> the queue is a list named tx_data <marvin24> if the list is not empty, it will notify the ec to start the transfer (we can't do it because we are slave) <marvin24> if after 5 secs the transfer is not finished, it will reset the message pointer (pointing to the next char to send) <marvin24> the buffer is only freed if the message was transfered successfully <marvin24> but if we timeout too often, we cannot accept new messages anymore <marvin24> the problem is that most messages are async and they don't care about return values <marvin24> if the tx queue is full (because we timeout all the time), we cannot send anymore <marvin24> in fact, (nearly) all communication should be sync I think <marvin24> but the sync write is not very robust yet <marvin24> and still needs a lot of work <stuw> marvin24, thanks for explanation. <marvin24> stuw: thanks for review ! <stuw> marvin24, is nvec_request_master (i.e. send to EC) and nvec_dispatch (i.e. read from EC) performed in parallel ? I mean we should read all messages from EC before send anything if send to EC will block read from EC operation (If I understood EC documentation correctly) <marvin24> stuw: no, they can be on the fly (in theroy) <marvin24> but it's possible that we are not sending a new message unless the old one is finished <marvin24> the sending, not the receive of the ack message <stuw> Prev msg is a little bit wrong: we should read responses before send requests. <stuw> marvin24, ok. thx once again :) <marvin24> stuw: feel free to create a hack which improves it <stuw> marvin24, I should understand code first :) ... <rpiloose> dump of the code by muromec @ 17 march 2011: http://crap.muromec.org.ua/ac100/ecdump.bin <rpiloose> of shit, I missed that: http://share.grandou.net/ac100/ec/
Errors
- nvec nvec.2: timeout waiting for ec transfer
We set gpio to initiate transfer but failed to transfer packet to EC for some reason.
- nvec nvec.2: could not allocate RX buffer
Receive pool is full. Looks like rx messages keep used (not freed).
- nvec nvec.2: unexpected status flags 0x18 during state 1
- nvec nvec.2: unexpected status flags 0x08 during state 0
- nvec nvec.2: unexpected status flags 0x1c during state 0
- nvec nvec.2: unexpected status flags 0x18 during state 0
Have no idea yet. 0x08 = 01000b (bits: 3) 0x18 = 11000b (bits: 3,4) 0x1c = 11100b (bits: 2,3,4)
<6>[ 113.168691] psmouse.c: Wheel Mouse at nvec/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 2 bytes away. <6>[ 113.705433] psmouse.c: resync failed, issuing reconnect request <6>[ 115.309056] elantech: assuming hardware version 3 (with firmware version 0x150500) <6>[ 115.357593] elantech: Synaptics capabilities query result 0x69, 0x17, 0x09. <6>[ 115.569173] input: ETPS/2 Elantech Touchpad as /devices/serio0/input/input7
Have no idea yet.
Debugging
Openbench Logic Sniffer - http://sigrok.org/wiki/Sigrok-cli